The Parties Reached an Informal Understanding, Expert Says on De-escalation with Belarus

Lukashenko

Political analyst Ruslan Bortnik commented on the statement by the Belarusian Ministry of Defense that it does not see a threat of aggression from NATO or Ukraine, and explained what lies behind it, Politeka reports.

He shared his views on his blog.

"Belarus is trying to reduce tensions around itself and its borders. This is not only a matter of security but also of the economy. Belarus remains one of the key transit hubs for international trade, including Chinese and Russian trade. Therefore, it has no interest in escalation at this point," Bortnik explained.

According to the analyst, these conciliatory statements are an attempt to convey that everything is calm in Belarus, that there are no tensions, let alone any likelihood of war, that no one intends to attack NATO, and that Europe faces no threat from this direction.

He noted that the narrative within Europe is quite different. Western media continue to publish articles about potential threats—for example, outlining five possible scenarios for a Russian attack, three of which involve an offensive launched from Belarus. Therefore, Bortnik argues, Belarus is using these statements to ease tensions following a period of heightened strain.

"However, it appears that the parties have reached an informal understanding. I mean Ukraine and Belarus, because we have indeed stopped hearing statements about the repeaters. There is simply silence now. Were they there or not? We don't know. Were they operating or not? We cannot say for certain either. But a period of silence has begun, the purpose of which is probably, above all, to ensure the continuation of trade flows that are now very important, including for Europe," Bortnik concluded.


Operation “M&M’s” Returns: Expert Explains the Goal of Blocking Russian Airports

Russian delegation at G20: Expert assesses whether negotiations will resume after meeting with Bessent

Putin realized that he has less time than he expected, expert says amid sharp escalation of the war

“Russia’s window of opportunity will not remain open”: Expert assesses the threat posed by jet-powered Shaheds

“Russia will strike Ukraine’s strategic rear”: Expert warns of threats to Europe

The War Could Freeze Even Without an Agreement, Expert Says on CIA Director’s Proposal

Motherhood, the Economy, and the Defense Industry: Expert Says Discussions About Mobilizing Women Are Premature

“Someone Wanted to Play War”: Expert Assesses Whether the Kremlin Will Seek Peace Due to Economic Problems

Trump Has Given Putin an Opportunity to Test NATO, Expert Says on Potential Russian Aggression Scenarios

Far-right politics of violence obsessed with historical revisionism: expert comments on violence against Ukrainians in Poland

Political Expert on Talks with Lukashenko: “Better This Than Getting an Additional Front Line”

Putin and the People: Expert Says Russian Dictator Could Lose Support in Elections

“Russia Has Effectively Issued an Ultimatum”: Expert Assesses Whether a Major War at Sea and in the Oceans Could Begin

“Russia’s losses exceed its mobilization capacity”: Expert says what Putin will do

“Master of Deals”: Expert Says Trump Has Failed with Iran and the Gaza Strip

Public Sentiment or Manipulation: Expert Explains Whether Russia Is Really Ready to Use Nuclear Weapons

“This Is a Threat to All Democracies”: Expert Warns of Possible North Korean Involvement in the War

Passive Phase, Sanctions, and Nuclear Issues: Expert Assesses Whether There Is Any Chance of Negotiations with Russia

This Is a Hallmark of a War of Attrition: Expert on Assassination Attempts Against Military Leaders and Elites

Show more