Non-Polar World: Expert Assesses Whether China Can Become the New Hegemon

China

Economist Alexey Kushch explained that we are currently living in a non-polar world, where the old hegemon is already exhausted, while the new one has yet to offer a viable alternative, Politeka reports.
He spoke about this on Ruslan Bortnik’s channel.

“The thing is, it’s very dangerous to describe the current geopolitical situation using the conceptual tools of the 1970s. It’s like trying to explain quantum physics using the terminology of classical mechanics. This leads to a mistake — one that many are making today — because the global continuum has fundamentally changed,” Kushch asserts.

As he explains, the 1970s were characterized by a classic bipolar world, where the Soviet and Western blocs opposed each other, with a layer of neutral countries in between. Today, the expert notes, we are transitioning into a so-called non-polar world.

“A non-polar world means that the old hegemon can no longer perform the functions of global leadership, while the new one is not yet able to take on these functions — in other words, it hasn’t yet formed as a hegemon. So the world is effectively frozen in a kind of limbo or transitional stage between the unipolar world that replaced the bipolar one, and a potential future bipolar world, should a new hegemonic contender emerge — for example, China, if it begins to truly function as an alternative global system,” Kushch explains.

In that case, the expert notes, at some point we could return to a bipolar world — with the U.S. on one side and China on the other. But for now, he argues, China clearly falls short of forming a true alternative even on a conceptual level, which is why we currently find ourselves in a non-polar world, with all the consequences that come with it.

Latest news:

Let's remember Politeka wrote, War in Ukraine: expert talks about the problems of the Russian army and the situation on the front.

Politeka also informed, The Armed Forces of Ukraine have begun to create "drone lines" with a 50-kilometer strike zone: Russian troops will not be able to launch offensives.

In addition, Politeka informed, Trump changes strategy: expert reveals how the US will achieve peace in Ukraine.


“A Traditional Period for Stockpiling Weapons”: Expert Explains Whether the Energy Truce Made Sense

War on Two Fronts: Expert Describes Pressure on Ukraine in Negotiations

Putin’s Middle Eastern epic: an expert explains how quickly the Kremlin is losing allies

Production and Consumption: Expert Explains Why Inflation Exists in Ukraine

The EU Bans Supplies of Russian Gas: An Expert Assesses How Long This Decision Will Last

The Countdown to the End of the Russian–Ukrainian War Has Begun, Says a Military Expert on the Energy Truce

Oil Prices and Strikes on Refineries: Expert Names a Likely Reason for an Energy Truce

Light, Cold, and Missile Strikes: Expert Assesses Progress in Peace Talks

Midterm elections and the desire for a quick victory: an expert assessed whether the United States will really withdraw from peace negotiations

Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy: Expert Assesses Whether Ukraine Could Still Receive Tomahawks

“We have already agreed to freeze the war along the front line – that is our compromise,” political strategist on the negotiations

The Minsk Model of Ceasefire Monitoring Was Discussed, with Adjustments — Political Scientist on Talks in the UAE

Free Trade Zone in Exchange for a Peace Agreement: Expert Explains What the U.S. Is Offering Ukraine

“Flies at an enormous speed”: an expert explained the danger of Russian Kh-22 missiles

“Economic mechanisms are the quintessence of Ukrainians”: an expert explains why the Singapore scenario is impossible here

“They simply had to agree with the Americans”: expert says the U.S. has begun pressuring Russia in negotiations

Europeans and Russians Have a Goal on the Territory of Ukraine: An Expert Spoke About Political Goals in the War

“A catastrophe involving nuclear reactors may occur”: expert warns about the consequences of Russian strikes

“Another plus Trump has scored for himself”: an expert explains why the U.S. threatened Greenland

Show more