Privacy and Secrecy: Expert Explains Why Trump and Putin Will Meet in Alaska

Donald Trump, Putin

Political scientist Ruslan Bortnik explained that Alaska is an example of land purchase and sale, which makes it symbolic that Trump and Putin will meet there to discuss Ukraine without any eavesdropping, reports Politeka.

He shared this in his blog.

According to the expert, Alaska is a very interesting place for a meeting between Trump and Putin, as this region of the U.S. was bought from Russia in 1867 for $7,200,000. Moreover, he points out, the U.S. bought Alaska along with its population, making it a truly remarkable place that is also geographically close for the leaders of both countries.

"It’s noteworthy how global powers can agree on the fate of vast territories and the people living on them. Why am I mentioning this now? Because the question will be the same again. The question of meeting in Alaska is once again territorial; however, now the fate of Ukraine will be at stake, not Russian or American lands," emphasizes Ruslan Bortnik.

Additionally, the expert notes that Alaska will allow Trump and Putin to discuss their issues in a situation of heightened security, without the ears of China, Europe, or Ukraine—if Zelensky isn't invited. So, he concludes, these negotiations will take place in maximum privacy, allowing Trump and Putin to speak more openly and candidly, as they will be discussing the exchange of territories.

"Yes, it’s formally said that Alaska is also about maritime trade routes, Arctic cooperation... Yes, that’s true, but above all, Alaska is a kind of symbolic backwater that will ensure unprecedented security, privacy, and secrecy for these negotiations, aside from its territorial and human symbolic value," asserts Ruslan Bortnik.

Latest news:

Let's remember Politeka wrote, War in Ukraine: expert talks about the problems of the Russian army and the situation on the front.

Politeka also informed, The Armed Forces of Ukraine have begun to create "drone lines" with a 50-kilometer strike zone: Russian troops will not be able to launch offensives.

In addition, Politeka informed, Trump changes strategy: expert reveals how the US will achieve peace in Ukraine.


“A Traditional Period for Stockpiling Weapons”: Expert Explains Whether the Energy Truce Made Sense

War on Two Fronts: Expert Describes Pressure on Ukraine in Negotiations

Putin’s Middle Eastern epic: an expert explains how quickly the Kremlin is losing allies

Production and Consumption: Expert Explains Why Inflation Exists in Ukraine

The EU Bans Supplies of Russian Gas: An Expert Assesses How Long This Decision Will Last

The Countdown to the End of the Russian–Ukrainian War Has Begun, Says a Military Expert on the Energy Truce

Oil Prices and Strikes on Refineries: Expert Names a Likely Reason for an Energy Truce

Light, Cold, and Missile Strikes: Expert Assesses Progress in Peace Talks

Midterm elections and the desire for a quick victory: an expert assessed whether the United States will really withdraw from peace negotiations

Behind-the-Scenes Diplomacy: Expert Assesses Whether Ukraine Could Still Receive Tomahawks

“We have already agreed to freeze the war along the front line – that is our compromise,” political strategist on the negotiations

The Minsk Model of Ceasefire Monitoring Was Discussed, with Adjustments — Political Scientist on Talks in the UAE

Free Trade Zone in Exchange for a Peace Agreement: Expert Explains What the U.S. Is Offering Ukraine

“Flies at an enormous speed”: an expert explained the danger of Russian Kh-22 missiles

“Economic mechanisms are the quintessence of Ukrainians”: an expert explains why the Singapore scenario is impossible here

“They simply had to agree with the Americans”: expert says the U.S. has begun pressuring Russia in negotiations

Europeans and Russians Have a Goal on the Territory of Ukraine: An Expert Spoke About Political Goals in the War

“A catastrophe involving nuclear reactors may occur”: expert warns about the consequences of Russian strikes

“Another plus Trump has scored for himself”: an expert explains why the U.S. threatened Greenland

Show more