“This Is a Guarantee of War”: An Expert Assesses Whether Western Troops Would Flee Ukraine if Russia Attacked Again

army

Political analyst Pavlo Zhovnirenko explained that the deployment of Western troops to Ukraine after the war, as suggested by the NATO Secretary General, is an absurd idea that does not even guarantee they would not flee in the event of danger, Politeka reports.

He said this on the “7 Steps” channel.

“An absolutely absurd statement by the Secretary General of the North Atlantic Alliance. Everyone is laughing at this, you understand? Why would we need troops after the war is over? How will the war end if you don’t help? So they will help us only after we defeat Putin? And only when they already have guarantees. They need guarantees so that no one shoots at them. Then they will come in. And where will they come in? Somewhere on the left bank. They won’t be standing on the front line,” Pavlo Zhovnirenko argues.

According to the program’s guest, even if one imagines that the Coalition of the Willing were to deploy British and French troops to Ukraine—and that it would require not 5,000 but 40,000 from each country—and even if this were not on the left bank, there would still be no guarantee that they would fight in the event of a Russian attack.

He also recalls that in 1939, at the beginning of World War II, the British Expeditionary Force, with aircraft, tanks, and artillery, fled from France. Moreover, the expert emphasizes, all of this happened in a very humiliating manner: German troops lined up on both sides, formed their tank columns, and gave the British a corridor for evacuation, but deliberately did not open fire on them in order to show who was in charge and who controlled the situation.

“Do you understand? They fled. And that’s exactly how it will be here. So this is not a guarantee of peace, it is a guarantee of war—a guarantee of war with an even more weakened Ukraine,” Pavlo Zhovnirenko stresses.


Latest news:

Let's remember Politeka wrote, Expert Explains Why Europe Is Providing Ukraine with War Aid: “It’s the Greatest Shield”

Politeka also informed, He became one of the brightest figures in Polish politics: Sławomir Majman talks about the new president of Poland

In addition, Politeka informed, Expert Explains Whether the West Can Destroy Russia’s Shadow Fleet


A New Nuclear Arms Race: An Expert Explains Why the U.S. Doesn’t Want to Extend New START

Pragmatism vs. Fanaticism: An Expert on Trump’s Peacekeeping Efforts

“The Chances of Ending the War Are Around 70%”: An Expert Gives a Realistic Forecast

Finns Question Article 5: Expert Explains How a NATO Member Fears Security Guarantees

Pragmatism vs. Fanaticism: An Expert Assesses Which Regime China Needs

We Are Facing a Nuclear Arms Race — Political Scientist on the Expiration of the New START Treaty

“Trump Presented It as His Victory”: Expert Explains Who Actually Negotiated the Energy Truce

Money and New Alliances: An Expert Explains Why the Russia–Ukraine War Benefits China

“Tokayev Has Decided to Speak Out Openly Against the Russians”: Expert Names the Reasons

“The Ceasefire Helped Organize the Attack”: Expert Explains Why Kh-22 Missiles Are Flying at Kyiv Again

“The negotiations have reached some kind of peak”: expert assesses why Russia is once again issuing threats

The sides began discussing substantive issues: an expert assesses the negotiation track in Abu Dhabi

“India Is Turning Westward”: Expert Explains What Russia Will Lose

“A Traditional Period for Stockpiling Weapons”: Expert Explains Whether the Energy Truce Made Sense

War on Two Fronts: Expert Describes Pressure on Ukraine in Negotiations

Putin’s Middle Eastern epic: an expert explains how quickly the Kremlin is losing allies

Production and Consumption: Expert Explains Why Inflation Exists in Ukraine

The EU Bans Supplies of Russian Gas: An Expert Assesses How Long This Decision Will Last

The Countdown to the End of the Russian–Ukrainian War Has Begun, Says a Military Expert on the Energy Truce

Show more