An Agreement with the U.S. Might Be Quite Sufficient to Obtain Real Security Guarantees – Expert Opinion

Donald Trump

Political analyst Ruslan Bortnik explained that the U.S. is unlikely to protect its allies unless there is economic benefit, and Ukraine can provide such benefit by signing a resource agreement, according to Politeka.

He shared this in his blog.

"The Ukrainian negotiation team has already signed a preliminary memorandum. Frankly speaking, it means nothing. The parties have essentially returned to the original model of negotiations: first, a memorandum of intent, and only then a full agreement. It's just one page long. Yulia Svyrydenko and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signed this agreement. And the most important thing in this memorandum is April 26, 2025 – the potential date for signing the actual agreement," Bortnik noted.

He explained that there is currently a struggle within the Western world for access to Ukraine's natural resources, as the U.S., France, and the U.K. all believe they should play a key role in this matter.

In addition, the expert said, there is a rivalry between Russia and the U.S., since the Kremlin is not satisfied with a scenario where it only gets 20% – i.e., the occupied territories. However, he suggested that just because Moscow is not satisfied does not mean it will protest. No, they may agree, but only in exchange for concessions – such as the lifting of sanctions. At the same time, Bortnik pointed out, the U.S. efforts to keep Ukraine within the Western sphere of influence remain underestimated.

"Instead of demanding virtual security guarantees like NATO and Article 5, this agreement with the U.S. might be quite sufficient to obtain real security guarantees in the form of American interests. For example, is there any certainty that the U.S. would defend Estonia? Yes? No? It's unclear, there is no such certainty. But if the U.S. has serious economic interests in Ukraine, then it's likely that the U.S. would defend Ukraine, even if it's not a NATO member," Bortnik concluded.

Latest news:

Let's remember Politeka wrote, Trump Gives Europe an Ultimatum on Which Communication Technologies to Use.

Politeka also informed, Rubio and Kellogg urges Trump to take a tougher stance on Moscow and Kremlin demands.

In addition, Politeka informed, Trump escalates trade war: who is hit by the new tariffs.


Funeral of Pope Francis: The Vatican Announces the Date and Details of the Farewell Ceremony

Trump's Support in the USA Declines: Approval Rating Falls to Lowest Level

There May Be a Collusion Between Russia and the US – Expert on Changes in American Politics

Review of Subsidies and Tariffs: Journalist Explained What Will Change in May

War in Ukraine: Free Housing for IDPs in Kyiv - Where to Seek Help

Expert Explains Why Putin Initiated the Easter Truce He Himself Violated: An Info-Psychological Move for Trump

Military Aid to Ukraine: Europe Is Shifting Its Strategy

Peace Deal to End the War in Ukraine: Trump Promised Great Prospects

USA-China trade war: Xi Jinping appeals to ‘Asian family’

Spring-Summer Campaign: Expert Reveals Where Russia’s Main Offensive Will Be

Gasoline Prices in Ukraine: How Fuel Costs Will Change Starting May 1

The More Territory the Ukrainian Armed Forces Reclaim, the Stronger Ukraine Is at the Negotiating Table: Expert Opinion

Counterfeit Money in Ukraine: Which Banknotes Are Most Commonly Forged and How to Spot Them

Oil prices: Russia prepares for a hit from USA tariffs

China uses 'new weapons' against USA: what gives it leverage

Utility Tariff Increases in Kyiv: What Will Cost More in May

Putin-friendly country lures customers: who offers cheap loans for weapons

Offensive on Crimea: Expert Explains Why Russia Really Wants a Black Sea Ceasefire

In the Near Future – Either April 20 or 30 – Everything Will Be Decided, Says Military Expert on War and Negotiations

Show more